Blog

Introduction

The latest retail fashion today is the AI based chatbots that change how brands interact with customers gather feedback and shop. Chatbots already are a part of the retail operations in certain sectors to respond to questions, recommend products based on personal preferences, and even negotiate prices. Apart from costing less, such virtual intermediaries influence the buyer’s mentality against brands and making customers loyal, trustworthy and satisfied. To understand such dynamics, technological inputs combined with managerial inputs would not suffice but ethnographic sensitivity engaging consumers into life routines, mood and cultural context while interacting with AI systems. This literature review identifies how subsequent research arises and describes consumer interaction with chatbots in retail settings. A development of emotion response, communication, personalization and wider implications for retailing policy. The review illustrates just how dense rich ethnographic research renders knowledge. This review is thematic in focus on issues of service recovery and loyalty and marketing, consumer psychology and new challenges in digital media.

Theoretical Perspective

1. Service Recovery and Consumer Loyalty Chatbots -

The most effective area for chatbots in a service failure context is service recovery where quality of recovery is violated and can be capable of re-gaining consumer loyalty and trust. (Bergner et al., 2023) examined chatbot mediated service recovery with fashion and illustrated how anger and frustration of consumers influence consumer responses. This is represented by frustration aggression theory and phenomenological hermeneutics, while conducting research found that customers complain the chatbot’s language is rude in the event of a mistake. Ethnographic evidence for this article says that frustration or anger may be withheld from the brand and not necessarily aimed at technology. The study also dived into a customer segment that separated customers into two groups based on whether customers felt certain emotions while they interacted with chatbots and indicated managers to balance between chatbots and human touchpoints (Bergner et al., 2023). The study is in the best ethnographic tradition since emotions used in off conversation between people defining social and cultural standards of quality of service. High spend customers have “perfect” experience expectations and anything that is used with automated recovery will be seen as brand abandonment. One experiment in which immersion in stories collected through deep interviews was prioritized (Bergner et al., 2023) hit the sharply context-dependent aspect of customer-chatbot interactions through brand placement and self-concept concepts.
 

2. Marketing Adjustments Through Human Machine Interactions -

Besides being used for service recovery, chatbots are becoming a mark on the marketing as a whole. Chatbots are a force in shaping marketing trends according to (Kaczorowska-Spychalska, 2019). Chatbots versus traditional technologies allow continuous, personalized and emotional interaction with customers. The study found that chatbots affect mental processes, redefine the market place and open up new dimensions to closer identification with brands. From the ethnographic point of view, the research findings are a proposition that the consumer is no longer the receiver of the advertising message. They are the senders of communications whose cultural context, tone and perceived empathetic
understanding of the discourse part in forming the consumer attitude. The
indeterminacy of the edge of the relations of human to human (H2H), human to machine (H2M) and machine to human (M2H) relations conceived by (Kaczorowska- Spychalska, 2019) is a product of social change while technology is being considered as social. Ethnography can bring out the way in which the consumer is appropriating the above relations through chatbots etc.

3. Rise of Agentic Retailing and Retailing AI - (Meyer 2025, n.d.) explained that it appeared to be “agentic AI,” independent systems with greater capabilities than scripted dialogue. Agentic AI agents differ from standard chatbots responding to questions in that they negotiate on contracts turn into personal shoppers and employ other agents to source best fit customer experiences. It was argued in the research that this revolution was possibly not necessarily most technology savvy but rather a workers revolution that redesigned consumer experience in a fundamental sense. In ethnography research this redesigning requires research into AI facilitated shopping lived experience. When shopping online or offline consumers will mostly be dealing with independently functioning AI-agents that are making decisions that consumers may or may not be aware of. Low cultural stakes: consumer trust will be restored when decision-making computers are running autonomously and not as an assistant.
(Meyer 2025, n.d.) definition places ethnography in the site of the consumers’ negotiation of autonomy, agency and control of these interactions.

4. Case Study Finding: H&M Chatbot in Business Communication

One real retailing example that happens is that of (H&M Case Study, n.d.) the research on which explored how H&M used AI-driven chatbots to aid consumer inquiry. They detailed both the enhancements of efficiency like faster turnaround times, 24/7 service and the persistent problems of chatbot use like inability to handle nuanced questions and consumer frustration with impersonality of responses. Even while the chatbot enabled the conversation the outcomes did account for the type of balancing human interaction with automation for satisfaction.
This is only one example of assisting characters on consumer experience as opposed to performance levels by ethnographic methods. As a starting point, the measurement of the reaction of individual groups of H&M consumers towards experience with automation can potentially reveal varied levels of toleration. (H&M Case Study, n.d.) then went on that at any given time consumer frustration is highly probable when chatbots misinterpret tone and intent, where ethnography would remain better than having online communications assumptions.

5. Para-social Relationship and Affective Bond with Chatbots - (Lee & Park, 2022) experimented whether media studies para-social relationship theory can be used to examine consumer experience with AI shopping chatbots. Experiments among middle-aged Korean women showed that consumers have such close relationships with chatbots as they have with friends. Para-social relations had positive influences on communication quality perceptions, satisfaction and continuance usage intentions.This finding supports social and affective extensions of chatbot use from productive to relational intentions. Ethnography is a strong instrument with which the way such para-social relationships are built in societies. Middle-aged Korean women for instance, would be emotionally intimate with chatbots but customers somewhere else are not.(Lee & Park, 2022) findings state how chatbot customer interaction can’t be bounded unless psychological and cultural factors in building perceived intimacy and trust are determined. Besides communication and therapy, chatbots are web salespeople. (Hildebrand & Bergner, 2019) established that consumer behavior, upselling and even liking can be initiated by chatbots. Their research emphasized the significance of conversational processes such as personalization in establishing engaging and believable user experiences. Shared language, emotions and consumer attribute
were established to have a heavy impact in enabling intimacy and persuasion.

6. Chatbots in CRM and Managerial Implications - From managerial scope to enlarged scope (Khneyzer et al., 2024) studied the application of AI supported chatbots in customer interactions. From expert interviews they agreed that chatbots provide effectiveness, reduce cost and supplement human potential in any business activity like retailing. Nonetheless, they agreed on drawbacks like industry-scale effectiveness and ethics issues. From an ethnographic perspective, such management benefits would need to be taken off against consumers everyday life. The business excellence of one company can be attained at the cost of impersonality or reduced authenticity of relationship of
consumers. Ethnography can assist in whether chatbot mediated CRM is creating long term relational relationships or alienating human-touch-needing consumers.

7. Cultural and Contextual Applications - Because fashion or retail is brought into the limelight to it, (Lajis, 2024) carried out Malaysian food culture studies with the help of chatbots. Their “MelakaEats” chatbot suggested restaurants depending on taste, special diet requirement, and budget. Technology Acceptance Model was used to identify in the study that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness influenced consumer attitude towards the chatbot.

8. Industry-Wide Learning’s - Banking & Restaurants (Dinculeana, n.d.) also researched bank take-up by AI in Europe earlier and made recommendations that were applicable for retail too. He talked about 24/7 chatbot availability and conserving time from being lost on the process and customer experience customization. He talked about ethics and compliance issues too like data protection and security. While fashion or retail has been the primary focus, (Lajis, 2024) researched Malaysian culinary heritage and chatbots. It proposed restaurant recommendations based on individual taste liking, nutritional requirement and budget through their MelakaEats chatbot. Technology Acceptance Model was employed in the study and
arrived at the conclusion that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness affected consumer attitude towards the chatbot.

Research Gaps
First, emerging research is derived from surveys or experiments and not in depth ethnographic studies. More participant and observation studies would have to be conducted that can observe first-hand how end-consumers integrate chatbots into consumption practice on a daily basis. Second, cultural differences of adoptability of chatbots are poorly-theorized. While the figures are exposed by South Korean, Malaysian and European studies, ethnographic before and after comparison across countries can expose abrupt difference of adoption and anticipation. Consumer pattern of the modes of processing frustration, attachment or trust of chatbot dialogue needs to be further studied. Last, the agentic AI compels us to expose how autonomous agents re-interpret and re-establish consumer agency and decision-making.

 

Conclusion
AI chatbots evolved from test technology to retail icons overnight. They answer questions, assist orders, rebound from service errors and create relationships with consumers. These fragments co-respond to the potential and boundary of such forms of technologies. Ethnographic studies bring with them a dense grain of knowledge upkeep to such an extent that they are extremely sensitive to consumer experience, cultural context and affective processes. Cross-cultural and longitudinal ethnographies need to be on our research agenda in the future so that they may inform us not only about how consumers interact with chatbots but also how consumers make sense of such interactions in wider social and cultural contexts.